Antiochian Christology in Theology of Diodore of Tarsus and Theodore of Antioch ; Антиохийская христология в богословии Диодора Тарсийского и Феодора Мопсуестийского ; Антиохійська христологія у богослов'ї Діодора Тарського та Теодора з Мопсуестії
Christianity, despite the diversity of currents, appears to be a holistic spiritual tradition that carries out its activity in specific historical, political and economic conditions. The main idea of Christianity is the personality of Jesus Christ. Christological doctrine as a systematic learning of Jesus Christ is the most important aspect of Christian doctrine, the key to understanding other religious issues: the dogma of the Trinity, pneumatology, ecclesiology, religious anthropology and soteriology.Religious positions of Christianity from the 1st century of Christian history, were naturally associated with the gospel image of Jesus Christ, generating endless attempts to interpret His substance. The most difficult Christological question for the theologians was to determine the relationship between the human and divine nature of Jesus Christ. To translate the category of faith, which reflects the most regularities and relations that exist in reality in systematized theological thought, became an uneasy task before which Christian thinkers were put in the conditions of the domination of Greek philosophy. However, the Christian dogma was Apophatic, and the content of theological truth was most often manifested through the negation of the theological fiction. In opposition to the Gnostics, the reality of the human nature of Christ was confirmed, and in the controversy with Judaism and the Arians, the reality of His Divinity was protected.In the 4th century, the Christological thought reached such a limit, when further elucidation of questions became impossible without the development of exact theological terminology, as well as without a deep knowledge of anthropology and philosophy in general. Therefore, in Antiochian theologians, in the Christological problems, special attention was paid to the moral aspect of the doctrine of the double essence of Christ, separated from the main postulates of Greek philosophy. A peculiar interpretation of Christology was presented in the concepts of the Antiochian theologians Diodore of Tarsus and Theodore of Mopsuestia. Diodore of Tarsus, developed theology of incarnation, which, and differed in the return to realism in his representation of the human nature of Christ, tended to identify two sides of his Personality in the form of two separate individuals and thus provoked Nestorian disputes of the next century. The follower of Diodore's ideas was Theodore of Mopsuestia, whose doctrine also follows the tendency to think and talk about Christ as two different individuals. ; Рассматривается важный христологический диспут, который возник в конце четвертого столетия между представителями александрийского и антиохийского направлений богословской мысли. Предметом дискуссии стало определение соотношения божественной и человеческой природы в Особе Христа. Установлено развитие Диодором Тарсийским богословия Воплощения, которое имело тенденцию определять две стороны Его Личности в виде двух отдельных индивидуумов. Проанализирована христологическая модель Теодора Мопсуестийского, согласно которой Христос обладал двумя разными личностями. ; Розглядається важливий христологічний диспут, який виник у кінці четвертого століття між представниками олександрійського і антіохійського напрямків богословської думки. Предметом дискусії стало визначення співвідношення божественної та людської природи в Особі Христа. Встановлено розвиток Діодором Тарським богослов'я Втілення, яке мало тенденцію визначати дві сторони його Особистості у вигляді двох окремих індивідуумів. Проаналізована христологічна модель Теодора з Мопсуестії згідно якої Христа володів двома різними особами.